When you migrate off WordPress, your editorial user roles and permissions do not carry over as-is, because they belong to WordPress’s own access model, so you recreate team access on the new platform using its way of handling users and permissions. WordPress has roles like administrator, editor, author, contributor, and subscriber, each with set capabilities, and the new platform, whether it has its own admin, a headless CMS, or a code-based workflow, will express access differently, so you map who needs to do what onto its model rather than copying the roles literally. Passwords do not transfer, since they are hashed, so team members get new access or reset their credentials. This is also a natural moment to prune stale accounts and tighten who has access. Note that customer or subscriber accounts on a store are a separate topic from editorial roles. WPBuildAI sets up the right team access on the new platform, mapping your editorial roles to its permission model, so the right people can manage the site from day one.
Roles belong to WordPress, not to your content
The key idea is that user roles are part of the platform, not part of the site’s content. WordPress ships a roles and capabilities system, administrator, editor, author, contributor, subscriber, each with defined powers, and that system is WordPress’s own way of controlling who can do what. It is configuration tied to the platform, so like other configuration it does not travel with your pages and posts to a new platform that has its own access model. This means you do not migrate roles as data; you recreate access as a deliberate setup task, mapping your team’s needs onto whatever the new platform provides. Seeing roles as platform configuration, not portable content, is what frames the whole task correctly.
Recreate access by need, not by name
Because the new platform expresses access differently, recreate it from first principles: what does each person actually need to do? Someone who publishes needs publishing rights; someone who only drafts needs less; whoever manages settings needs administrative access. Map those needs onto the new platform’s model, which might be its own roles, a headless CMS’s accounts, or a code-based workflow with repository permissions, aiming for functional parity rather than a literal copy of WordPress’s role names, which may not exist. This is the same reason a rebuild does not simply import every WordPress structure: you reproduce the outcome, the right people can do the right things, using the new system’s own mechanisms. Start from need, translate to the new model, and access ends up correct even though the role names differ.
Passwords reset, as always
As with any account migration, passwords are the predictable exception. They are stored as one-way hashes that the new platform cannot reuse, so team members do not arrive with their old passwords intact; they get new credentials or reset on first access, exactly as customer accounts do. For a small team this is trivial to coordinate, just tell people how they will get access, but it should be planned rather than left as a surprise on launch day when someone cannot log in to publish. So set up the new accounts and communicate how each person signs in, so the team can manage the site from the moment it goes live rather than scrambling for access afterward.
Use the move to prune and tighten access
A migration is an opportunity to improve security, not just reproduce it. Sites accumulate stale accounts over time, former staff, one-off contributors, unused logins, and over-privileged users who have more access than they need, and each is a liability. Rather than copying every existing account across, recreate access only for the people who genuinely need it, at the minimum level they need. This tightening is a security win the migration hands you for free, and it aligns with treating team and customer data carefully under rules like the GDPR. So audit who has access before recreating it, and leave the stale and over-privileged accounts behind. Starting fresh with least-privilege access is far healthier than importing years of accumulated logins you never cleaned up.
Keep editorial roles distinct from customer accounts
A clarity point worth stating: editorial user roles and customer accounts are different things, handled separately. Editorial roles are your team’s access to manage the site, the subject here. Customer or subscriber accounts on a store are the shoppers’ accounts, with order history and addresses, migrated through the store-account process. Conflating them leads to confusion, treating customers as if they were staff, or vice versa. Neither is an SEO concern, since access models do not affect rankings and the platform itself is not a ranking factor, as the Backlinko analysis shows; both are about who can do what. Keeping the two migrations separate, team access on one track and customer accounts on another, keeps each one clean and correctly scoped.
Steps to handle user roles in a migration
- Audit existing accounts and roles, noting who genuinely needs access.
- Define each person’s needs in terms of what they must do, not role names.
- Map those needs onto the new platform’s permission model.
- Recreate access at the minimum level required, leaving stale accounts behind.
- Plan credentials, since passwords do not transfer, and tell the team how to sign in.
- Keep customer accounts separate, handled on their own track.
Worked example: cleaner access after the move
Consider a content team on WordPress that had, over years, accumulated a dozen accounts, several belonging to former freelancers, and a couple of extra administrators no one remembered granting. Migrating, they treated user roles as a setup-and-audit task rather than a copy. They listed who actually needed access, mapped each person’s real needs onto the new platform’s permission model, and recreated only those accounts, at the right levels, leaving the stale and over-privileged ones behind. Passwords were set fresh, and everyone was told how to sign in before launch. The team could manage the new site from day one, and the site was more secure than before, because the migration had pruned years of access sprawl instead of importing it.
Limitation: complex permission setups need deliberate mapping
It is honest to bound this. A simple team maps easily, but a complex WordPress permission setup, custom roles, granular capabilities from plugins, or workflows depending on specific role behaviors, will not have exact equivalents on a different platform, so it needs deliberate mapping and, sometimes, rethinking how the workflow is expressed. The new platform may be more or less granular than WordPress, so aim for the closest sensible fit to your actual needs rather than an impossible exact match. So scope permission-heavy setups honestly: a standard editorial team is quick, while a site with elaborate custom roles and capability-driven workflows deserves real planning of how access and publishing will work on the new platform, decided intentionally rather than assumed to transfer.
Key points
When you migrate off WordPress, editorial user roles and permissions do not carry over, because they belong to WordPress’s own access model, so you recreate team access on the new platform, mapping each person’s actual needs onto its permission model rather than copying role names. Passwords are hashed and do not transfer, so plan fresh credentials and tell the team how to sign in before launch. Use the move to prune stale and over-privileged accounts and grant least-privilege access, which is a free security win, and keep editorial roles distinct from customer or subscriber accounts, which migrate on their own track. Neither affects SEO. Scope complex custom-role and capability-driven setups deliberately, since they lack exact equivalents on a new platform. WPBuildAI sets up the right team access on the new platform, mapping your editorial roles to its permission model, so the right people can manage the site from day one. Send your web address for a free analysis.
Not affiliated with WordPress, Lovable, Webflow, Shopify, Wix, or Squarespace.